The White Bridge (Akköprü) — a Roman crossing over the Granicus River

The White Bridge: A Roman Crossing over the Granicus

In northwestern Turkey, near modern-day Biga in the province of Çanakkale, the Granicus River (Turkish: Biga Çayı) was once spanned by Akköprü—the “White Bridge.” In the Late Roman period, it was one of the largest bridge structures in Mysia: eight arches, marble retaining walls, and masonry made of brick and small stones. Only fragments of the bridge have survived to the present day: in the 19th century, it was largely dismantled for building materials for local roads. But even the remains and old descriptions leave an impressive picture of the engineering thought of late Antiquity.

History of the Bridge

The White Bridge across the Granicus was built, according to researchers, in the 4th century CE—likely during the reign of Emperor Constantine the Great (died 337 CE). This was an era of active restoration of Roman roads in Asia Minor and the strengthening of communications between Constantinople and the Asian provinces. The bridge provided a crossing over the capricious Granicus River, known since the time of Alexander’s battle with the Persians in 334 BCE.

The first detailed description of the bridge was provided by the English traveler Edmund Chishull in 1699: at that time, the structure was still largely intact. In the 19th century, it was inspected by William Turner (1815), Pyotr Chikhachyov (1847), and in the 1890s by the German explorer Janke. All of them noted characteristic Roman features: load-bearing chambers beneath the roadway, marble cladding, and brick-and-stone masonry.

The bridge’s downfall came in the 19th century: stone and marble were actively stripped away for the construction of local roads and buildings. By the early 20th century, when British archaeologist Frederick W. Hasluck surveyed the area, only scattered fragments remained of Akköprü. Today, only isolated foundations and pieces of masonry remain in the riverbed and along the banks of the Biga.

Architecture and What to See

Eight Arches

The bridge in its entirety had eight arches: four main ones spanning the main river channel, and four smaller ones—flood arches—on the sides. The longest span was about 18 paces (approximately 13–14 meters), and the width of the roadway was about 8 paces (about 6 meters).

Materials

The bridge was constructed of brick and small rubble stone with marble retaining walls on the sides. This combination, characteristic of late Roman Late Antiquity, ensured both strength and an elegant appearance: the marble facades reflected light, while the brick core absorbed temperature fluctuations.

Unloading chambers

Underneath the roadway were unloading chambers—hollows that reduced the weight of the structure on the supports. This technique is typical of the Roman and early Byzantine bridge-building schools and is well documented in 19th-century descriptions.

What Remains Today

Today, only scattered fragments of the bridge remain: the bases of the supports in the Biga Riverbed, fragments of brickwork, and scattered marble blocks. There is no full-scale “tour” as such—this is a site for local historians and those interested in Roman engineering.

Interesting facts

  • The bridge stood on the Granicus River—the very same river on whose banks Alexander the Great won his first major victory over the Persians in 334 BCE.
  • The bridge was best documented by Edmund Chishull in 1699—an English traveler and chaplain who traveled through Asia Minor.
  • The bridge’s systematic destruction was not caused by wars or earthquakes, but by economic “cannibalism”: in the 19th century, its marble and bricks were used for local roads.
  • Akköprü (“White Bridge”) is the popular Ottoman name, derived from the whiteness of the marble cladding: from a distance, the bridge did indeed look bright.
  • Today, the site is rarely included in tourist itineraries—it is a rare “forgotten” ruin of the Roman Mission.

How to get there

The remains of the bridge are located near the modern town of Biga in the province of Çanakkale (northwestern Turkey, Marmara region). Coordinates: 40°22′21″ N, 27°18′36″ E. From Çanakkale to Biga—about 80 km. From Istanbul—about 250 km via the ferry crossing or the 1915 Çanakkale Köprüsü bridge.

It is best to drive to the ruins themselves: there is no public transportation directly to the site. A landmark is the modern bridge across the Biga River in the vicinity of Biga; the old piers are visible in the riverbed and on its banks.

Tips for travelers

Be prepared for the fact that there is no classic “tourist attraction” with a sign and a trail here. This is a destination for those who specifically travel to the region to see the Roman and Byzantine traces in Mysia. Bring along 19th-century descriptions and photographs—without them, it is difficult to imagine the bridge’s original scale.

The best time to visit is late spring and early fall: the water level in the Bigi is lower, and the foundations of the supports are more visible in the riverbed. In winter and spring, floods can completely submerge the fragments.

Combine your visit with a trip to Troy (Truva), Çanakkale, Assos, and Kızılcukur—this allows you to put together a substantial itinerary covering ancient Mysia and the Troad in 2–3 days. Bring sturdy shoes and insect repellent: the approaches to the river are often marshy and overgrown with reeds.

Respect the remaining ruins: do not attempt to move the stones or take any “souvenirs.” This bridge has already suffered more damage than many surviving Roman structures—every stone here is a rarity and a valuable resource for future research.

Your comfort is important to us, click on the desired marker to create a route.
Meeting for minutes before
Yesterday. 17:48
Frequently asked questions — The White Bridge (Akköprü) — a Roman crossing over the Granicus River Answers to frequently asked questions about The White Bridge (Akköprü) — a Roman crossing over the Granicus River. Information about the service's operation, capabilities, and use.
The name “Akköprü” translates from Turkish as “White Bridge.” It is a folk name, dating back to the Ottoman era, and is linked to the structure’s appearance: the marble cladding on the sides of the bridge reflected the sunlight, and from a distance the structure did indeed appear light in color, almost white. This is a characteristic feature of the late Roman architectural tradition—marble was used not only as a structural material but also as a decorative one.
According to researchers, the bridge was built in the 4th century CE—presumably during the reign of Emperor Constantine the Great, who died in 337. This period was marked by a large-scale restoration of the road network in Asia Minor and the strengthening of ties between Constantinople and the eastern provinces. The bridge provided a crossing over the Granicus River—an important section of a strategic road.
It was on the Granicus River (Turkish: Biga Çayı) in 334 B.C. that Alexander the Great won his first major victory over the Persian army. This battle opened the way for him to advance deep into Asia Minor. The White Bridge was built much later—about seven centuries after the battle—but stood on the same river, giving the site a rich historical depth.
The main cause of the destruction was not war or earthquakes, but the economic “cannibalism” of the 19th century. Marble blocks and bricks were actively stripped away for use in the construction of local roads and buildings. When British archaeologist Frederick W. Hasluck surveyed the site in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, only scattered fragments remained of the once-majestic structure. This is the typical fate of many provincial Roman structures.
In its entirety, the bridge had eight arches: four main arches spanning the river’s main channel and four smaller flood-relief arches on either side. The main span was approximately 13–14 meters long, and the roadway was about 6 meters wide. The structure was built of brick and rubble stone, with marble cladding on the sides. Beneath the roadway were unloading chambers—an architectural feature typical of the late Roman and early Byzantine bridge-building traditions. The first detailed description was recorded by the English traveler Edmund Chishull in 1699, when the bridge was still largely intact.
Today, only scattered fragments remain at the site of Akköprü: the foundations of the piers in the bed of the Biga Çayı River, pieces of brickwork, and individual marble blocks along the banks. There is no developed viewing area, information signs, or walking path. This is a site for people with a specific interest in Roman and Provincial Byzantine engineering—not a major tourist attraction.
This site is not an organized museum or a protected historic site with a ticket office or admission fees. Fragments of the bridge are located in the riverbed and on its banks in the vicinity of Biga—access to them is essentially unrestricted. This is precisely why it is especially important to behave with care: do not move the stones or take any fragments—each one is valuable for future research.
The best time to visit is late spring (May) and early fall (September–October). During these periods, the water level in the Biga Çayı River drops, and the bases of the piers become more visible in the riverbed. In winter and early spring, floods can completely submerge sections of the bridge, making inspection pointless.
First and foremost, this is for people interested in Roman and early medieval engineering, provincial archaeology, and “hidden” sites. This site is not for those looking for classic tourist attractions with developed infrastructure. It fits well into an itinerary for travelers touring the ancient ruins of Mysia and the Troad who are already planning to visit Troy (Truva), Assos, or Çanakkale.
Yes. The bridge was documented by several travelers and scholars: Edmund Chishull in 1699, William Turner in 1815, Pyotr Chikhachyov in 1847, the German explorer Janke in the 1890s, and the British archaeologist Frederick W. Hasluck in the early 20th century. Their descriptions and sketches allow us to reconstruct the structure’s appearance. Before your trip, it’s worth reading at least brief excerpts—without this context, the ruins look like ordinary stones in a river.
User manual — The White Bridge (Akköprü) — a Roman crossing over the Granicus River The White Bridge (Akköprü) — a Roman crossing over the Granicus River User Guide with a description of the main functions, features, and principles of use.
Akköprü isn’t a major tourist attraction. Before adding it to your itinerary, make sure you’re interested in provincial Roman engineering and are prepared to explore ruins without any amenities. It’s convenient to include this site in an itinerary covering ancient Mysia and the Troad, along with Troy (Truva), Assos, Çanakkale, and the surrounding ruins—that way, the trip to the bridge won’t be a separate detour but will fit logically into a 2–3-day tour of the region.
The nearest major landmark is the town of Biga in the province of Çanakkale in northwestern Turkey. It is about 80 km from Çanakkale to Biga and about 250 km from Istanbul: you can travel via the ferry crossing or the 1915 Çanakkale Bridge. Buses run to Biga from Çanakkale and Istanbul, but public transportation is not suitable for the rest of the journey to the ruins—you will need a car.
Coordinates: 40°22′21″ N, 27°18′36″ E. Be sure to download them in advance to your GPS or offline map, as mobile internet coverage near the river may be unreliable. Look for the modern bridge across the Biga Çayı near Biga—old supports and fragments of masonry are visible in the riverbed and along its banks.
There is no established hiking trail here. Be sure to wear sturdy, waterproof shoes—the paths leading to the river are often marshy and overgrown with reeds. Bring insect repellent. Print out or save the 19th-century descriptions and photographs for offline viewing: without historical context, it’s hard to imagine exactly what you’re looking at and the scale of the structure.
Look for the bases of the supports in the riverbed—they are most visible in late spring and fall, when the water level is low. Look for fragments of brickwork and marble blocks along the banks. Do not attempt to move the stones, and do not take anything with you: the site is not guarded, and visitors’ careful behavior is the only protection for the remaining fragments for future research. The recommended time for the tour is about an hour and a half.
To make the most of your trip, combine a visit to Akköprü with other attractions in the Mysia and Troas regions: Troy (Truva) near Çanakkale, the ancient city of Assos on the Aegean coast, as well as Kızılçukur and the ruins along the road through the province. In 2–3 days, you can plan a rich itinerary exploring the ancient heritage of northwestern Turkey, where the White Bridge will be a rare and memorable “discovery” off the beaten path.